Donald Trump on Health Care

Collins, Gail. "The Secret Side of Donald Trump." The New York Times. 25 Feb. 2016.

I agree with this article in terms of cynically criticizing both Republican and Republican Candidate, Trump. The author talks about Trump who is going for a president makes comments about health care benefit. He makes not a statement, but more like a bluff. 

He says he would not want people “dying on the sidewalks”. I do not know whether it is campaign thing that made Trump say that or that he really does not want people to die on the streets, especially for the poor people. 

As far as it seems, Trump is just making comments to satisfy and raise more votes while most Republicans plans to make him president as this is a part of campaign. 

The author made personal opinions about how Trumps making non-sense and illogical comments while there still is a fainted possibility that he is going to be a president. 

He makes comments,  “O.K., so here’s where I’m a little bit different. I don’t want people dying on the streets and I say this all the time.” and then he says, “I don’t like the term mandate, personally, because that sort of means mandatory,” Trump comments about Obama health care. It contradicts with Trump's, I guess, belief. Because then He says he wants  everybody have health savings accounts, letting the states figure out medicaid with federal block grants, and make health insurance premiums tax-deductible.

The author's intended audience is the persons interested in presidential race that is going on right now and she wants to make people to know what Trump said in the presidential campaign. The author is credible because when I went into her several editorial articles, she is the person who writes about presidential campaign, with up-to-date information. 

U.S. Government takes on Paris Climate Agreement

Finally U.S. Government and other nations joined in Paris Climate Agreement for healthy climate changes. The goal was to decrease at least half of 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Many people argues that this will not cure entire greenhouse gases, and carbon emission  from developing countries such as China and India because they contain no legal requirements. This is voluntary actions from already developed countries to appropriate money to poor countries about $100 billion a year. The countries do not want to make blames on the developing or poor countries as they did not follow the rules. And also the reason is following statement.

"That hybrid legal structure was explicitly designed in response to the political reality in the United States. A deal that would have assigned legal requirements for countries to cut emissions at specific levels would need to go before the United States Senate for ratification. That language would have been dead on arrival in the Republican-controlled Senate, where many members question the established science of human-caused climate change, and still more wish to thwart Mr. Obama’s climate change agenda." New York Times.

Mr Xi, president of China complained certain undeveloped areas need progress of development that there is no other way around from still developing. After Obama's announcements, Republicans argued middle-income classes does not have enough money for it to continue while wealthy individuals can. This is worth reading because how climate changes affected Republicans party's takes on Climate changes and they agreed to do so because it is such a global issue. While they united on climate agreements, the nations will reconvene every five years.